It is fascinating to see the relationship between early 20th Century fashion - dictated by the late Victorian era - to the introduction and adaptation of the military uniform as fashion wear. Uniforms under-went a massive transformation - from soldiers looking spick and span in impractical, decorative hats and jackets with tassels hanging off them and highly polished knee-high leather boots to a more rugged, unglamorous khaki utilitarian look. This was possibly a reaction to the horror of the First World War’s trenches: war is not glorious or glamorous, it is bloody and it is definitely not a fashion parade.
Social behaviour and social standing for an early 20th century British officer dictated that the man was to be respected and often had a standing in the British aristocracy. Therefore he had to be dressed well and look polished in his military uniform. Society today does not look at the military officer or soldier in the same light. The men who go to war in the name of the government of the day often do so with very little thanks.
Society no longer thinks it grand or adventurous to ran off to foreign lands and kill the evil Hun or Turk.
Nowadays the spick and span still exists in the modern Army, but it is left for the ceremonial occasions of military pomp and parades. The people who design military uniforms and equipment have long since forgotten the traditions of our forefathers who dressed in tall hats, long leather boots, white pants and carried muskets - 10 feet tall when fitted with a bayonet. Instead they’ve adopted a practical approach to combat troops and their equipment.
Camouflage – first introduced to the Australian military in the early 1980s - is now a highly recognisable fashion statement on the world’s ski slopes. The fashion industry has adopted the “camo” approach to all ski and boarding clothing and equipment.

















